Aim: The aim of the study was to compare P-wave morphology and duration in pacing from the low right atrial septal wall and the high right atrial appendage (RAA).
Methods: The electrocardiogram (ECG) of 50 patients with low atrial septum (LAS) pacing and that of 50 patients with RAA pacing were compared with their electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm.
Results: In the frontal plane, patients with LAS pacing showed a superior P-wave axis between -60 degrees and -90 degrees . In all patients with RAA pacing, a P-wave axis between 0 degrees and +90 degrees was observed as in sinus rhythm. In the horizontal plane, all patients with LAS pacing had an anterior P-wave axis between +90 degrees and +210 degrees , whereas all patients with RAA pacing had a posterior P-wave axis between -30 degrees and -90 degrees . The terminal part of biphasic P waves in lead V 1 in LAS pacing was always positive, a pattern that was never observed in P waves of sinus origin or in RAA pacing. P-wave duration was longer with RAA pacing compared with LAS pacing (115 +/- 19 vs 80 +/- 14 milliseconds [ P < .01]).
Conclusion: The total atrial activation time during LAS pacing is shorter than that during RAA pacing. The electrical atrial activation sequences in LAS pacing and RAA pacing are significantly different. The morphology of biphasic P waves in lead V1 during LAS pacing suggests that the initial part of activation occurs in the left atrium and the terminal part in the right atrium.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2004.10.005 | DOI Listing |
Heart Rhythm
December 2024
Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) needs confirmation of left conduction system capture assessed by testing of different electrical parameters. Guidelines recommend the use of an electrophysiology recording system (EP-RS) to guide conduction system pacing procedures. However, some experienced centers perform LBBAP procedures without an EP-RS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJBI Evid Implement
December 2024
Spanish Centre for Evidence Based Healthcare: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Prevention and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
January 2025
Universidad CES School of Medicine, Medellin, Colombia.
Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and endocardial resynchronization (Endo-CRT) are alternatives to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Objective: To compare the outcomes of LBBAP versus Endo-CRT using conventional pacing leads.
Methods: Patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing CRT with LBBAP or Endo-CRT were included.
Heart Rhythm
September 2024
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe and Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas en RED en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Valencia, Spain.
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a guideline-recommended therapy in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF, 36%-50%) and left bundle branch block or indication for ventricular pacing. Conduction system pacing (CSP) using left bundle branch area pacing or His bundle pacing has been shown to be a safe and physiologic alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP).
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between BVP and CSP for patients with HFmrEF undergoing CRT.
Heart Rhythm
September 2024
Cardiac Arrhythmia Department, Great Metropolitan Hospital Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Background: Enhanced characterization of the atrial electrical substrate may lead to better comprehension of atrial fibrillation (AF) pathophysiology.
Objective: With the use of high-density substrate mapping, we sought to investigate the occurrence of functional electrophysiological phenomena in the left atrium and to assess potential association with arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation.
Methods: Sixty-three consecutive patients with AF referred for ablation were enrolled.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!