The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a progressive program, starting with simple methods and, when not effective, moving to more complex methods, to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients with diabetes mellitus. A total of 284 diabetic patients with ED entered into a 6-phase program starting with sildenafil citrate (Viagra). Those with contraindications, side effects, or negative response (erection insufficient for vaginal penetration) were switched to the vacuum erection device (VED), and then progressively (for failures) to intracavernous injection (ICI), sildenafil citrate+ICI, ICI+VED, and penile prosthesis. Patients were followed for 2 y. Of the 284 patients 276 patients were eligible for sildenafil citrate and 147 (53.3%) responded positively, but 25 (9.1%) patients stopped it soon due to adverse effects. Of 162 patients (129 nonresponders, eight noneligible for the sildenafil and 25 patients who dropped out due to adverse effects), treated with VED, 114 (70.4%) responded well, however, only 19 (11.7%) patients agreed to continue its use. Of the remaining 143 patients (nonresponders, noneligible for the previously mentioned treatments and patients who dropped out due to adverse effects), 103/143 (72%) responded to ICI, 27/40 (67.5%) to sildenafil+ICI, and 9/13 (69.2%) to ICI+VED. Four patients received a penile implant. At the 2 y follow-up, 81 of 284 patients who entered the study (28.5%) were still responding to sildenafil, seven (2.5%) to VED, 113 (39.8%) to ICI, 24 (8.5%) to sildenafil+ICI, two (0.7%) to ICI+VED; 15 (5.3%) had a penile implant. In all 17 (6%) patients reported spontaneous erections, 11 (3.9%) stopped the treatment due to family reasons and 14 (4.9%) failed the treatment. In conclusion, the progressive treatment program for ED seems to be very effective for diabetic patients, yielded a complete response for short-term and 91.2% rate of success at the end of 2 y follow-up.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901337 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Form Res
January 2025
Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Background: Social media has become a widely used way for people to share opinions about health care and medical topics. Social media data can be leveraged to understand patient concerns and provide insight into why patients may turn to the internet instead of the health care system for health advice.
Objective: This study aimed to develop a method to investigate Reddit posts discussing health-related conditions.
JMIR Form Res
January 2025
Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Background: Patient recruitment and data management are laborious, resource-intensive aspects of clinical research that often dictate whether the successful completion of studies is possible. Technological advances present opportunities for streamlining these processes, thus improving completion rates for clinical research studies.
Objective: This paper aims to demonstrate how technological adjuncts can enhance clinical research processes via automation and digital integration.
JMIR Serious Games
January 2025
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Optus Chair Digital Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Background: This review explores virtual reality (VR) and exercise simulator-based interventions for individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Past research indicates that both VR and simulator-based interventions enhance cognitive functions, such as executive function and memory, though their impacts on attention vary.
Objective: This study aimed to contribute to the ongoing scientific discourse on integrating technology-driven interventions into the management and evaluation of ADHD.
JMIR AI
January 2025
Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Background: In the contemporary realm of health care, laboratory tests stand as cornerstone components, driving the advancement of precision medicine. These tests offer intricate insights into a variety of medical conditions, thereby facilitating diagnosis, prognosis, and treatments. However, the accessibility of certain tests is hindered by factors such as high costs, a shortage of specialized personnel, or geographic disparities, posing obstacles to achieving equitable health care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Med Inform
January 2025
Department of Systems Design Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Background: While expert optometrists tend to rely on a deep understanding of the disease and intuitive pattern recognition, those with less experience may depend more on extensive data, comparisons, and external guidance. Understanding these variations is important for developing artificial intelligence (AI) systems that can effectively support optometrists with varying degrees of experience and minimize decision inconsistencies.
Objective: The main objective of this study is to identify and analyze the variations in diagnostic decision-making approaches between novice and expert optometrists.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!