Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and caries-preventive effects of a fluoride varnish (Fluor Protector; 0.1% fluoride) and a chlorhexidine varnish (Cervitec; 1% chlorhexidine and 1% thymol) on initial caries of occlusal fissures and to monitor the durability of the varnishes by the use of a fluorescence system, DIAGNOdent (Dd).
Method And Materials: Nineteen subjects underwent professional tooth cleaning at the beginning of the study. Afterward, fluorescence measurements (baseline) were obtained from 56 test sites and 28 control sites on the central fossae of molars. Each subject had Fluor Protector and Cervitec application on randomly assigned experimental teeth, and applications were followed by Dd measurements. Measurements were repeated after 1 and 6 months.
Results: There was an increase in fluorescence values immediately after application of varnish in the two test groups. One month after varnish application, Dd scores for group Fluor Protector were not significantly different from Dd scores obtained immediately after application (P = .108), whereas Dd scores for group Cervitec decreased significantly (P = .007). For both test groups, there was a significant decrease between the values obtained immediately after application and those acquired after 6 months. There was also a significant decrease between 1 month and 6 months for test groups and a slight but significant increase for the control group (P = .011). No significant difference was found between the Fluor Protector and Cervitec groups after 6 months.
Conclusion: It was concluded that the Dd system may be used to monitor the existence of these two varnishes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent
March 2024
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Introduction: The cycles of demineralization and remineralization result in a dynamic process of caries development. Caries are prevented by the shift in the balance from demineralization to remineralization at the tooth-oral fluid interface with the help of salivary fluoride levels (in parts per million). The advantages of fluoride varnish application over other substitutes like dentifrices, mouthrinses, gels, or foams are that varnishes are well tolerated by infants, young children, or children with special healthcare needs and have prolonged therapeutic effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dent
September 2024
Clinical Professor in Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Objective: The study objectives were to examine the physical properties and enamel remineralization potential of fluoride (F) varnishes incorporated with arginine (Arg).
Methods: Four commercial F varnishes: 1) Duraphat®; 2) Flúor Protector®, 3) Fluor Protector S®, and 4) Fluorimax™ were supplemented with 2% w/v. Arg.
Dent Mater J
March 2024
Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong.
The study aimed to examine the fluoride (F) release potential of arginine (Arg)-incorporated F varnishes. Four commercially available F varnishes were included in the study: Duraphat (5% NaF), Flúor Protector (0.9% SiHF), Fluor Protector S (NHF), and Fluorimax™ (2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Clin Pediatr Dent
August 2023
Department of Public Health Dentistry, College of Dental Science and Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of Tooth Mousse Plus, Remin Pro, and Fluor Protector Gel on enamel erosion, measuring mean weight loss after exposure to a demineralizing agent.
Materials And Methods: A total of 60 sound-extracted permanent incisors were sectioned and enamel specimens were randomly distributed to different groups. The initial weight of all specimens was registered.
Am J Dent
August 2023
Faculty São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil,
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different varnishes on dentin permeability to erosive/abrasive challenges.
Methods: 60 superficial dentin discs were randomly allocated to six groups (n=10): Duraphat, PRG Barrier Coat, Clinpro XT, Profluorid, Fluor Protector S and untreated (control). Permeability tests were carried out: after acid conditioning, after treatment, and after abrasive/erosive challenges.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!