Patients with gastric cancer considered amenable to a curative surgical procedure on the basis of a conventional preoperative workup (N=98) answered health-related quality-of-life questionnaires and completed a psychiatrist's interview before the intervention. All patients were blinded to the type of surgical procedure that would ultimately be performed; 64 patients eventually received a potentially curative resection, and 34 had palliative surgery. The curative resection group reported significantly more hopelessness before the operation than the palliative surgery group. The latter group had more eating dysfunction but minimized their distress to a greater degree than those with a more limited tumor burden. Eating dysfunction, hopelessness, and the tendency to minimize distress were independent predictors of prognosis. The findings highlight the need for careful medical interviewing to enhance patient-physician communication about symptoms and signs of malignant diseases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.46.3.233DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tumor burden
8
gastric cancer
8
surgical procedure
8
curative resection
8
palliative surgery
8
eating dysfunction
8
relationship tumor
4
burden patients'
4
patients' minimization
4
minimization distress
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!