A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue? | LitMetric

Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?

Psychol Sci

Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Published: May 2005

AI Article Synopsis

  • Speakers may focus on their own ease of production and their addressees' ease of comprehension when producing ambiguous utterances in dialogue.
  • Previous research indicated that while ease of production influences syntactic choices, ease of comprehension did not; however, new experiments show otherwise.
  • The study found that participants adapted their language based on their partner's previous utterance and were more likely to clarify ambiguous statements when needed, indicating a consideration for how easily their messages would be understood.

Article Abstract

What affects speakers' production of ambiguous utterances in dialogue? They might consider ease of production for themselves, or ease of comprehension for their addressees. Previous research has demonstrated that ease of production plays a role in speakers' syntactic choices, but that ease of comprehension does not. However, such studies have not employed dialogues that involve role swapping on a turn-by-turn basis. In our experiment, participants alternated in giving and following instructions to move objects around on a grid. They tended to repeat the syntactic form just used by their interlocutor, reflecting sensitivity to ease of production. More interestingly, they were more likely to disambiguate their utterances when the visual context was potentially ambiguous than when it was not, reflecting sensitivity to ease of comprehension. We conclude that speakers pay attention to their beliefs about their addressees' ease of comprehension, in addition to considering ease of production for themselves.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01541.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ease production
16
ease comprehension
16
ease
8
reflecting sensitivity
8
sensitivity ease
8
production
5
speakers avoid
4
avoid ambiguities
4
ambiguities dialogue?
4
dialogue? speakers'
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!