Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Restenosis after coronary stenting is mainly caused by intimal hyperplasia. Both experimental and clinical studies suggest that statins may be able to inhibit intimal hyperplasia and, therefore, in-stent restenosis (ISR), by mechanisms beyond lipid lowering.
Methods: In a 12-month study, we randomized 71 normocholesterolemic patients to 20 mg simvastatin or no treatment, 2 weeks before elective coronary stenting. Patients were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound, immediately after the index procedure and at the 12-month catheterization.
Results: Binary ISR was present in 15% and in 18% of simvastatin-treated patients and controls, respectively (P = NS). Intimal hyperplasia did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (3.6 +/- 1.8 vs 3.8 +/- 2.3 mm3/mm, 34% +/- 15% vs 35% +/- 23% for simvastatin vs controls, P = NS). However, persistent plaque decreased with simvastatin but increased in controls (-4.0 +/- 4.0 vs +1.6 +/- 3.8 mm3/mm, -14% +/- 10% vs +6% +/- 12%, P < .05). The same behavior was shown by intermediate plaques at nonstented sites (-2.5 +/- 3.0 vs +1.0 +/- 3.0 mm3/mm, -10% +/- 8% vs +9% +/- 9%, P < .05). Major adverse events at 12 months were present in 11% and 24% of simvastatin-treated patients and controls, respectively (P = .20).
Conclusions: In normocholesterolemic patients undergoing coronary stenting, simvastatin does not prevent intimal hyperplasia or ISR, but it promotes atherosclerotic regression both at stented and at nonstented sites.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.032 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!