Purpose: To determine local control (LC) and complication rates for patients who underwent radiosurgery for radiation-induced intracranial tumors.

Methods And Materials: Review of a prospectively maintained database (2,714 patients) identified 16 patients (20 tumors) with radiation-induced tumors treated with radiosurgery between 1990 and 2004. Tumor types included typical meningioma (n=17), atypical meningioma (n=2), and schwannoma (n=1). Median patient age at radiosurgery was 47.5 years (range, 27-70 years). The median tumor margin dose was 16 Gy (range, 12-20 Gy). Median follow-up was 40.2 months (range, 10.8-146.2 months). Time-to-event outcomes were calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results: Three-year and 5-year LC rates were 100%. Three-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 92% and 80%, respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 100%. Three patients died: 1 had in-field progression 65.1 months after radiosurgery and later died of the tumor, 1 died of progression of a preexisting brain malignancy, and 1 died of an unrelated cause. One patient had increased seizure activity that correlated with development of edema seen on neuroimaging.

Conclusions: LC, survival, and complication rates in our series are comparable to those in previous reports of radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas. Also, LC rates with radiosurgery are at least comparable to those of surgical series for radiation-induced meningiomas. Radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment option for radiation-induced intracranial tumors, most of which are typical meningiomas.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiation-induced intracranial
12
radiosurgery
8
radiosurgery radiation-induced
8
intracranial tumors
8
local control
8
complication rates
8
three-year 5-year
8
survival rates
8
rates
6
radiation-induced
5

Similar Publications

Radiotherapy (RT) remains crucial in treating both primary and metastatic central nervous system cancer. Despite advancements in modern techniques that mitigate some toxic adverse effects, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans still reveal a wide range of radiation-induced changes. Radiation can adversely affect neuroglial cells and their precursors, potentially triggering a demyelinating pattern similar to multiple sclerosis (MS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Brain radiation necrosis is a serious adverse effect of radiotherapy in patients with malignant brain metastases. There is currently no standard treatment for brain radiation necrosis; however, there are advantages to using bevacizumab. Nonetheless, due to the risk of severe bleeding when bevacizumab is used in patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma, relevant clinical studies are lacking; therefore, there is no clear conclusion on the use of bevacizumab to treat brain radiation necrosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung with brain metastases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Brain metastases (BM) are the most common malignancy in the central nervous system (CNS) and observed in approximately 30% of cancer patients. Brainstem metastases (BSM) are challenging because of their location and the associated neurological risks. There are still no general therapeutic recommendations in this setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glioblastoma (GBM) is uniformly lethal due to profound treatment resistance. Altered cellular metabolism is a key mediator of GBM treatment resistance. Uptake of the essential sulfur-containing amino acid methionine is drastically elevated in GBMs compared to normal cells, however, it is not known how this methionine is utilized or whether it relates to GBM treatment resistance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the effectiveness and safety of anti-angiogenic combination therapy in driver gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases, comparing a group receiving this therapy (AT) to one receiving standard treatment (NAT).
  • Results show that the AT group had higher initial objective response rates (iORR) and longer progression-free survival rates compared to the NAT group, indicating better clinical efficacy of the combined therapy.
  • Despite the longer progression-free intervals, the overall survival rate (OS) did not significantly improve with anti-angiogenic therapy, and while the AT group experienced more hypertension, there was no significant increase in radiation-induced brain necrosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!