A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Effects of hVEGF cDNA on random skin flap via a replication-deficient adenovirus vector]. | LitMetric

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of local delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor( VEGF) transferred with adenovirus-mediated gene on the survival of ischemic random skin flap in rats.

Methods: The animals were divided into three groups randomly (n = 10) . A 2 cm x 8 cm dorsal skin flap was designed with the pedicle at the level of the iliac crest. In group A (AdCMV-VEGF), each animal received 10(12) PR replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus (AdCMV-VEGF) in the distal two-thirds of the proposed flap by means of the subdermal injection at ten different locations. In group B (AdCMV-GaI), each received 1012 PR AdCMV-Gal. In Group C (Saline), each received 1 ml saline. Three days after the treatment, the flap was elevated as planed way and re-sutured back to its donor site. All the animals were evaluated 7 days after the operation.

Results: The mean percentage of surviving flap area was (85.91 +/- 2.54)% in group A, (59.56 +/- l.18)% in group B, and (61.48 +/- l.09)% in group C. There was a significant increase in the percentage of the survival area in the flaps of the group A, compared with the group B and group C (Group B vs. Group A, P < 0.01; Group C vs.Group A, P < 0.01, Group B vs. Group C, P >0.05). Hybridization in the situ, the immunohistochemical stain showed that the VEGF was expressed in the survival tissue of the flap treated with the AdCMV-VEGF, but it was not found in the control groups. Histological analysis demonstrated qualitatively greater amount of granulation tissue and angiogenesis was found in the group treated with the AdCMV-VEGF than the controls.

Conclusions: The results may indicate that Ad vector carrying VEGF cDNA could be useful in enhancing the survival of the skin flap due to the effect of the local delivery of the VEGF.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin flap
16
group group
16
group
15
random skin
8
flap
8
local delivery
8
received 1012
8
001 group
8
treated adcmv-vegf
8
[effects hvegf
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!