Two experiments examined whether postsample signals of reinforcer probability or magnitude affected the accuracy of delayed matching to sample in pigeons. On each trial, red or green choice responses that matched red or green stimuli seen shortly before a variable retention interval were reinforced with wheat access. In Experiment 1, the reinforcer probability was either 0.2 or 1.0 for both red and green responses. Reinforcer probability was signaled by line or cross symbols that appeared after the sample had been presented. In Experiment 2, all correct responses were reinforced, and the signaled reinforcer durations were 1.0 s and 4.5 s. Matching was more accurate when larger or more probable reinforcers were signaled, independently of retention interval duration. Because signals were presented postsample, the effects were not the result of differential attention to the sample.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1193742PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2005.94-03DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reinforcer probability
16
red green
12
probability magnitude
8
delayed matching
8
matching sample
8
retention interval
8
reinforcer
5
effects signaling
4
signaling reinforcer
4
probability
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!