Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to study the relationship between intentional and incidental recognition of famous faces. Intentional and incidental recognition were operationally defined as repeated presentations of targets and nontargets within a modified Sternberg task. These repetitions elicited temporally and topographically distinct ERP modulations. A repetition effect around 300 ms (ERE/N250r) and a preceding modulation did not differ between intentional and incidental recognition, whereas a following repetition effect (LRE/N400) around 500 ms showed differences between incidental and intentional recognition. These results show that during the first few hundred milliseconds intentional and incidental face recognition relate to similar processing, indicating that familiar faces are recognized even when their identification is not required.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.008 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!