A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Carotid artery stent placement with distal balloon protection: technical considerations. | LitMetric

Background And Purpose: Most neurologic events that complicate the carotid artery stent placement procedure are embolic. Strategies are being developed and evaluated for their ability to minimize the clinical embolic risk. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, and technical considerations of performing carotid artery stent placement with use of a distal balloon antiembolization system.

Methods: Carotid artery stent placement with use of a commercially available distal balloon antiembolization system was performed in 303 patients (325 vessels). Clinical neurologic complications were adjudicated at the time of intervention and at 1 month.

Results: Technical success was achieved in all but one case, with reduction of the mean percentage carotid artery stenosis from 79 +/- 9% to 3 +/- 8%. Intolerance to internal carotid artery occlusion occurred in 11 patients (3.6%); in one patient the procedure was aborted, and in 10 the procedures were expeditiously completed with no adverse neurologic events. The 30-day combined rate of all occurrences of stroke and death was 2%. These events included three (0.9%) retinal emboli, three (0.9%) minor strokes, and one (0.3%) fatal stroke from brain hemorrhage, all of which occurred during the procedure with no events occurring after discharge. In addition, two (0.6%) transient ischemic attacks and three (0.9%) reperfusion syndromes occurred, with the patients experiencing complete recovery.

Conclusion: Carotid artery stent placement with use of the distal balloon protection system is feasible and safe, and the short-term outcomes appear to be favorable. Optimal application of proper technique is important.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977109PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carotid artery
28
artery stent
20
stent placement
20
distal balloon
16
placement distal
12
three 09%
12
balloon protection
8
technical considerations
8
neurologic events
8
balloon antiembolization
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!