Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: We report a new method of measuring visual function in patients with INS by demonstrating the effects of eccentric gaze and forced time restriction on optotype recognition.
Design: Cross-sectional, comparative case-series.
Methods: No-time-restricted acuity (NTRA) and time-restricted acuity (TRA) for 19 patients and 18 controls were measured at multiple horizontal gaze angles.
Results: INS patients showed a significant lower visual acuity than controls (P < 0.0001). The TRA were significantly decreased in most gaze positions relative to NTRA in INS patients (P = 0.03) while there were no difference among controls. About half of the INS patients showed that their best visual acuity was gaze dependent, matching the preferred head posture in both NRTA and TRA paradigms.
Conclusions: Gaze-dependent visual acuity tested with and without time restriction may be a useful measure of visual function in INS patients and could be used in interventional clinical trials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.09.069 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!