Purpose: To investigate differences in contact pressure in the bone tunnel between the inside-out and outside-in techniques used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Type Of Study: In vitro cadaveric analysis.
Methods: Four fresh-frozen cadaver knees were tested. A femoral tunnel was generated through the tibial tunnel (inside-out technique). Another femoral tunnel was created using a rear-entry guide at the same intra-articular exit (outside-in technique). Aluminum cylinders containing 4-way (anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral) conductive rubber pressure sensors at the entrance of the joint were inserted into the tibial and femoral tunnels. Dynamic changes in the contact pressure of grafts in the femoral and tibial tunnels during 0 degrees to 130 degrees of knee flexion were measured.
Results: Contact pressure of the graft migrated from the anterior to the posterior portion of the femoral tunnel upon alignment of the femoral and tibial tunnels. At 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of knee flexion, significantly greater contact pressure was observed at the anterior portion of the femoral tunnel made by the inside-out technique compared with that in the tunnel made by the outside-in technique. At 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of knee flexion, significantly greater contact pressure was observed at the lateral portion of the femoral tunnel made by the outside-in technique. Constant contact pressure was observed in the medial portion of the tunnel made by the inside-out technique. Pressure changes in the tibial tunnel were slight; moreover, changes were not influenced by the femoral tunnel direction under any conditions.
Conclusions: This study shows that contact pressure in the femoral tunnel is influenced by the direction of the femoral tunnel.
Clinical Relevance: The femoral tunnel direction in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is an important factor for femoral tunnel enlargement. A horizontal direction of the femoral tunnel might be needed for mature bone graft incorporation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.12.007 | DOI Listing |
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol
January 2025
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
This technical note explores the novel use of an imageless robotic surgical system for simultaneous unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Knee osteoarthritis (OA) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency are common conditions that traditionally require separate management. The integration of robotic assistance offers enhanced precision in surgical procedures, addressing both medial compartment OA and ACL insufficiency in a single operation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
The number of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RACLR) procedures is increasing in proportion to the increase in the number of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) procedures. Although approximately 50-75% of these procedures can be performed in a single-stage procedure, not all of them can. The choice of graft may influence the results of RACLR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthrosc Tech
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Florence - A.O.U. Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction presents various challenges not encountered in the primary settings, including malpositioned tunnels, tunnel widening, and the lack of consensus on the ideal graft to be used. This Technical Note describes a one-stage anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis. This technique represents the ideal approach to tackle complex revision cases primarily characterized by tibial and femoral tunnel osteolysis and rotational knee instability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFZhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao
December 2024
Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Medicine,Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing 100020,China.
Objective To compare the five-year subjective functional outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with three different femoral tunnel positions under arthroscopic guidance. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 165 patients who underwent ACLR at the Department of Sports Traumatology,Sports Hospital,National Institute of Sports Medicine,General Administration of Sport of China from January 2012 to December 2017.According to femoral tunnel positions,the patients were assigned into three groups of low centre (LC)section (=53),high centre (HC) section (=45),and high anterior medial (HAM) section (=67).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Background: A lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is increasingly being utilized to augment an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because it has been shown to reduce the risk of postreconstruction graft failure or recurrent rotatory instability. Various femoral fixation techniques are available, including the use of an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor.
Purpose: To determine and compare the biomechanical properties of an LET graft when using an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor for the femoral fixation for a modified Lemaire LET.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!