Objective: Reports of increased rates of psychosis in prisons could be due to sampling and ascertainment differences. The authors compared two samples of subjects 16-64 years of age: those from the general population of residents in Great Britain and prisoners in England and Wales.
Method: A random sample of remanded and sentenced male and female prisoners (N=3,142) and a two-phase, cross-sectional random sample of household residents (N=10,108) were assessed with structured questionnaires and the semistructured Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry.
Results: The weighted prevalence of probable functional psychosis in the past year was 4.5 per thousand (95% CI=3.1 to 5.8) in the household survey. In the prison survey, the weighted prevalence was over 10 times greater: 52 per thousand (95% CI=45 to 60). One in four prisoners with a psychotic disorder had psychotic symptoms attributed to toxic or withdrawal effects of psychoactive substances. The proportion of subjects with specific types of hallucinations or delusions did not differ between prison and household psychosis cases.
Conclusions: This large study using standardized comparisons showed that the prevalence of psychosis in prisons is substantially higher than in the community and is deserving of greater attention to treatment and prevention. Apart from a minority of prisoners with symptoms attributable to psychoactive substances, the clinical symptom profile of psychosis is the same in both settings. Longitudinal research is needed to better understand these prevalence differences.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.774 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Mortality, Criminal Sanctions, and Court Diversion in People With Psychosis.
JAMA Netw Open
October 2024
The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Article Synopsis
- People with psychosis face higher rates of early death and disproportionately interact with the criminal justice system, but the impact of criminal penalties on their mortality remains understudied.
- This study investigated how various types of recent criminal sanctions, like court diversion and imprisonment, affect mortality rates in individuals with psychotic disorders, using comprehensive data from New South Wales, Australia.
- Results showed that out of 83,071 participants, nearly one-third had received a criminal sanction, and the research aimed to identify the causes of death and differences in mortality rates based on the type of sanction applied, with a focus on those under 65 years old.
Fitness to stand trial: 415 consecutive defendants assessed by a New Zealand forensic psychiatry service.
Australas Psychiatry
October 2024
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, New Zealand.
Background: New Zealand defendants found unfit to stand trial following a Court-ordered forensic mental health assessment cannot be detained in prison and must either be released, or made subject to a mental health or intellectual disability order. There is increasing awareness of the need to identify these people and protect their rights.
Methods: Retrospective audit of 8 years of Court-ordered health assessor reports addressing fitness to stand trial prepared by a New Zealand regional forensic mental health service with a catchment area of around 850,000.
Prevalence of mental illness among Australian and New Zealand people in prison: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published over five decades.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry
December 2024
Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Article Synopsis
- The study highlights a significant disparity in mental health prevalence, showing that a higher percentage of prisoners in Australia and New Zealand suffer from mental illness compared to the general population.
- A meta-analysis of 17 studies revealed that about 69% of prisoners have experienced some form of mental illness over their lifetime, with 9.1% specifically having psychotic disorders.
- The findings indicate a concerning rise in the rates of psychosis over time, suggesting a need for better mental health interventions and diversion strategies to steer affected individuals away from the criminal justice system and into appropriate healthcare.
Which diagnoses and arguments regarding severe mental disorder do forensic psychiatric experts in Sweden consider in different cases? A qualitative vignette study.
Int J Law Psychiatry
September 2024
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Sweden; Centre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health (CELAM), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address:
Unlabelled: The decision-making process of experts in forensic psychiatric investigations (FPI) is complex and reasoning regarding psychiatric diagnosis and severe mental disorder (SMD, the judicial concept central to legal exemption in Swedish law) has severe ramifications. Nevertheless, the qualitative aspects of FPI experts' decision-making process have seldom been studied systematically.
Method: The participants (N = 41) were FPI experts: forensic psychiatrists (n = 15), forensic psychologists (n = 15) and forensic social workers (n = 11).
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!