Objective: One of the biggest challenges of the Mexican Health System is to get results of the treatment goals in diabetic patients, which can be frustrated by physician and patient's attitudes. The present study evaluates divergence of attitude of health providers and diabetic patients according to health sectors: private, social security or State medical services.
Material And Methods: They contributed 255 physicians and 255 diabetic patients in ambulatory care from three health sectors: private, social security and welfare (employees and patients were exclusive providers and patients of corresponding institutions). The Diabetes Attitude Scale 3 (DAS-3) was applied, a self-administered instrument used to compare attitudes between health care professionals and patients. Discrepancies were analyzed with t-tests, chi2, one-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparisons for observed means based on the Tukey test.
Results: Physician and patient's attitudes differed in all scales except for psychosocial impact of diabetes, which was independent of the health sector. Attitudes were not alike with respect to severity of the disease, value of tight control of glucose levels and patient autonomy, with no distinction of health sector. Discrepancy of need for special training was the only attitude that varied by health sector (F = 4.1; p = 0.02); it was similar for the private and social security sector but different for the welfare sector.
Conclusions: All health sectors should recognize attitude discrepancies between doctors and patients to favor collaborative strategies that benefit a better control of the disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
BMC Nutr
December 2024
Epsom General Hospital, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS, Epsom, United Kingdom.
Background: Experimental and clinical studies have suggested that symbiotics might effectively manage type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by modulating the intestinal microbiota. However, these studies' limited sources, small sample sizes, and varied study designs have led to inconsistent outcomes regarding glycaemic control. This study aimed to investigate the effects of symbiotics on the anthropometric measures, glycaemic control, and lipid profiles of patients with T2DM.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Infect Dis
December 2024
Infectious Disease Hospital of Heilongjiang Province, No. 1 Jian She Street, Hulan District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150500, China.
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health issue. Drug-resistant TB and comorbidities exacerbate its burden, influencing treatment outcomes and healthcare utilization. Despite the growing prevalence of TB comorbidities, research often focuses on single comorbidities rather than comorbidity patterns.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
November 2024
Department of Urology, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, China.
Background And Aims: This study evaluated the predictive value of the APF risk score in East Asian patients undergoing open nephrectomy and its correlation with hypertension and NAFLD.
Methods And Results: A retrospective study used the clinical data of 82 patients who underwent ON between January 2010 and December 2022. Per their APF score, patients were categorized into groups A (0-2 points) and B (3-4 points).
Surg Obes Relat Dis
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Marshall University Joan Edwards School of Medicine, West Virginia.
Background: The difference in survival between sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains controversial.
Objective: To investigate the comparative survival difference between SG and RYGB in adults with morbid obesity.
Setting: A meta-analysis.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address:
Background: Metabolic bariatric surgery is the most effective therapy for severe obesity, which affects the health of millions, most of whom are women of child-bearing age. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures and are associated with durable weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Although obstetric outcomes broadly improve, the safety profile comparing the impact of RYGB and SG on obstetric outcomes is underexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!