Evaluation of the NIOSH MWF total particulate matter: thoracic particulate matter conversion factor in a machining environment.

J Occup Environ Hyg

U.S. Public Health Service/Division of Federal Occupational Health, Westborough, Massachusetts, USA.

Published: April 2005

AI Article Synopsis

  • Worker exposures to metalworking fluids were assessed at a plant producing air compressors, with 147 air samples collected and analyzed for different types of particulate matter.
  • The geometric mean for thoracic particulate matter was 0.32 mg/m³, below the NIOSH recommended limit, but the total particulate matter mean was 0.52 mg/m³, exceeding the surrogate limit of 0.5 mg/m³.
  • The study found a significant disparity in conversion factors compared to NIOSH recommendations, suggesting that direct assessment of thoracic particulate matter exposure is necessary for accurate worker protection.

Article Abstract

Worker exposures to metalworking fluids were characterized at a plant that produced air compressors. Full-shift, side-by-side air samples (n = 147) were collected and analyzed for total particulate matter, extractable total particulate matter, thoracic particulate matter, and extractable thoracic particulate matter. The thoracic particulate matter geometric mean of 0.32 m/m (3)was below the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommended exposure limit (REL) of 0.4 mg/m (3). The total particulate matter geometric mean of 0.52 mg/m (3), however, was above 0.5 mg/m (3), the total particulate matter concentration offered as a surrogate REL in the NIOSHCriteria for a Recommended Standard for Occupational Exposure to Metalworking Fluids.[1]Of the 83 total particulate matter results that were at or above smash 0.5 mg/m (3), only 50 (60%) of the corresponding thoracic particulate matter results were at or above 0.4 mg/m (3). These data indicated a conversion factor of 1.65 between thoracic particulate matter and total particulate matter concentrations and 1.40 between thoracic extractable particulate matter and total extractable concentrations. These factors were significantly different from the 1.25 used to compare total particulate matter with thoracic particulate matter concentrations in the NIOSHCriteria Document[1](p < 0.01) and call into question the validity of a universal conversion factor. The authors conclude that thoracic particulate matter exposure assessment should be done directly. In terms of protecting the worker, however, the 1.25 conversion factor appeared to be conservative since each time a total particulate matter result was below 0.5 mg/m (3), its paired thoracic particulate matter measurement was below 0.4 mg/m (3).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15459620590933766DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

particulate matter
76
total particulate
36
thoracic particulate
36
particulate
19
matter
19
matter thoracic
16
conversion factor
16
total
10
thoracic
10
matter extractable
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!