A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Propofol for deep procedural sedation in the ED. | LitMetric

Propofol for deep procedural sedation in the ED.

Am J Emerg Med

Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center-Highland Campus, Oakland, CA 94602, USA.

Published: March 2005

Unlabelled: We sought to evaluate the use of propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) for ED procedural sedation, particularly when administered in a routine fashion for a variety of indications.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in an urban teaching ED. Propofol was administered by handheld syringe and combined with fentanyl. Measurements included propofol and fentanyl dose, serial vital signs, pulse oximetry, adverse events, and patient and physician satisfaction.

Results: One hundred thirty-six subjects (18 to 69 years) were enrolled. Procedures included 82 (60.3%) abscess incision and drainages and 47 (34.6%) orthopedic reductions. Adverse events occurred in 14 cases (10.3%; 95% confidence interval 5.2% to 15.4%), including hypotension in 5, hypoxemia in 7, and apnea in 5. One patient required intubation. Both patient and physician satisfaction were excellent.

Conclusions: ED procedural sedation with propofol was effective and well accepted by patients and physicians. However, it produced a significant incidence of hypotension, hypoxemia, and apnea.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2004.05.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

procedural sedation
12
adverse events
8
patient physician
8
hypotension hypoxemia
8
hypoxemia apnea
8
propofol
5
propofol deep
4
deep procedural
4
sedation unlabelled
4
unlabelled sought
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!