Multimedia data from two probability-based exposure studies were investigated in terms of how censoring of nondetects affected estimation of population parameters and associations. Appropriate methods for handling censored below-detection-limit(BDL)values in this context were unclear since sampling weights were involved and since bivariate associations/measures were of interest. Both simple substitution(e.g., using 1/2 or 2/3 of the detection limit(DL)for BDL values)and truncation-based strategies were investigated by creating some artificial DLs and comparing resultant estimates with the original studies'uncensored results. The substitution methods generally outperformed the truncation methods, with the(2/3)DL substitution generally performing best.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10529410390892133DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

limitations multimedia
4
multimedia exposure
4
exposure measurements
4
measurements multipathway
4
multipathway exposure
4
exposure assessment--part
4
assessment--part handling
4
handling observations
4
observations detection
4
detection limits
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!