AI Article Synopsis

  • The Ilizarov fixator can be customized for different anatomical shapes and treatment goals, but these adjustments may not match the mechanical strength of the standard design.
  • In a study comparing one standard and eight modified frame systems, various mechanical properties like axial compression and bending were tested using a material testing machine.
  • The best-performing modifications included drop wires and Schanz screws positioned at a 45-degree angle on the proximal ring, which showed mechanical performance most similar to the standard frame.

Article Abstract

The circular frame of the Ilizarov fixator can be modified to reflect anatomic variations and treatment aims. However, these modifications in the frame system cannot always achieve the mechanical performance of the standard frame system. A standard system has two rings in each bone fragment connected by four longitudinal bars on each side of the ring. In this study, the mechanical performances of one standard and eight modified frame systems were compared. Each system was loaded on a material testing machine, with calculation of axial compression, four-point bending, and torsion. As a result, systems that were modified with drop wires and Schanz screws 45 degrees oblique to the wires on the proximal ring provided a mechanical performance closer to the standard system than systems with other modifications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000152550.48706.a7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mechanical performance
12
frame system
8
standard system
8
frame
5
system
5
comparison mechanical
4
performance frame
4
frame configurations
4
configurations ilizarov
4
ilizarov external
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!