Mitral valve reconstruction.

Am J Surg

Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.

Published: May 1992

Modern repair techniques allow reconstruction rather than replacement of the mitral valve (MV) in the majority of patients requiring operation. Such patients are now older and more likely to have nonrheumatic MV disease than those treated in former years. A continuing experience with MV reconstruction was reviewed to determine its safety and efficacy. In 50 patients undergoing isolated MV reconstructions, there have been no postoperative deaths. In 36 patients undergoing mitral reconstruction combined with other cardiac procedures, there have been 5 deaths (14%). Three patients have required MV replacement for an inadequate repair as determined by evaluation during the repair or by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) following cardiopulmonary bypass. Overall complications have included five reoperations for bleeding, two perioperative myocardial infarctions, two strokes, and one aortic dissection. The majority of patients maintain an improved functional state after operation. Multiple reconstructive maneuvers are now available, and the elements of any given reconstruction depend on the pathoanatomy of the valve. Intraoperative TEE has been invaluable in planning, evaluating, and modifying repairs. At present, over 70% of all MV operations are reconstructions, and the most common recent indication for MV replacement is a malfunctioning prosthetic MV rather than native valve disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(92)90396-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mitral valve
8
majority patients
8
patients undergoing
8
patients
6
reconstruction
5
valve reconstruction
4
reconstruction modern
4
modern repair
4
repair techniques
4
techniques allow
4

Similar Publications

Mitral Valve Prolapse Caused by TLL1 Gain-of-Function Mutation.

Can J Cardiol

January 2025

The Morris Kahn Laboratory of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences and National Institute of Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel; Genetics Institute, Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er Sheva, Israel; The Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. Electronic address:

Background: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common cardiac valvular anomaly that can be caused by mutations in genes of various biological pathways. Individuals of three generations of a kindred presented with apparently dominant heredity of isolated MVP.

Methods: Clinical evaluation and echocardiography for all complying family members (n=13).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The impact of the COAPT results on clinical practice has not yet been investigated in large real-world cohort study. The aim of the study is to evaluate the potential impact of the COAPT trial by analyzing the temporal trends of baseline characteristics and outcome of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) patients undergoing MitraClip (MC) included in the GIOTTO registry.

Methods: The study population was divided into two groups, considering the enrolment before or after the COAPT publication.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prognostic impact of one-year permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery with the Cox-maze procedure.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

January 2025

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation within the first year after mitral valve (MV) surgery combined with the Cox-maze procedure, focusing on long-term outcomes, including overall mortality, infective endocarditis (IE), and ischaemic stroke.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) in South Korea, identifying 10,127 patients who underwent MV surgery with the Cox-maze procedure between 2005 and 2020. Patients were classified into the PPM and non-PPM groups based on PPM implantation within one year postoperatively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!