Assessment of sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amlodipine in a bioequivalence study.

Pharmacol Res

Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto Teófilo Hernando, Departamento de Farmacología y Terapéutica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Diego de León 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain.

Published: May 2005

Aims: This study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence between two 10-mg amlodipine tablet formulations. As secondary objectives, sex-related differences and tolerability profile were evaluated.

Methods: Thirty-six healthy volunteers (18 males and 18 females; age 20-32 years, weight 49.5-98.0 kg) were included in a randomised crossover study. Subjects were administered a single 10-mg oral dose of each formulation separated by a 14-day washout period. Plasma amlodipine levels were determined by a high performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometry detection.

Results: All subjects completed the study and 90% confidence intervals for relevant pharmacokinetic parameters were within the ranges defined by European and US Regulatory Authorities: the geometric mean and the 90% confidence interval test/reference ratios calculated from log-transformed values were 104.54 (101.46-107.72%) for AUC(0-infinity) and 100.32 (97.41-103.33%) for Cmax. There were no serious or severe adverse events. The tolerability profile appeared to be comparable for the two products. On average, bioavailability of amlodipine was slightly higher in females than in males, but these differences could be explained by the lower body weight of women. There were no sex-related differences in drug clearance. Bioequivalence was also demonstrated within each gender group. Amlodipine treatment produced a slight decrease of systolic blood pressure and an increased in heart rate, which were more pronounced in women. The incidence of adverse events was similar in men and women.

Conclusions: The two formulations were considered bioequivalent. Although there were no relevant gender-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine, women reached higher amlodipine concentrations most likely because of their lower body weight, and therefore, the reported pharmacodynamic effects were higher within this gender group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2004.11.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differences pharmacokinetics
8
sex-related differences
8
tolerability profile
8
90% confidence
8
adverse events
8
lower body
8
body weight
8
gender group
8
amlodipine
7
differences
5

Similar Publications

Background: Cabotegravir + rilpivirine (CAB + RPV) administered via intramuscular gluteal injections is the first complete long-acting regimen for maintaining human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) virologic suppression. We present substudy results on short-term repeat intramuscular CAB + RPV long-acting thigh injections in participants with ≥3 years of experience with gluteal administration during the ATLAS-2M study.

Methods: Substudy phases included screening, thigh injection (day 1-week 16), and return to gluteal injection (week 16-week 24).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: Early phase dose-finding (EPDF) trials are key in the development of novel therapies, with their findings directly informing subsequent clinical development phases and providing valuable insights for reverse translation. Comprehensive and transparent reporting of these studies is critical for their accurate and critical interpretation, which may improve and expedite therapeutic development. However, quality of reporting of design characteristics and results from EPDF trials is often variable and incomplete.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Optimal timing for lithium levels.

F1000Res

January 2025

Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Radiology, and Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Reddy and Reddy (2014) discuss the optimal timing for lithium levels in patients taking once-daily extended-release lithium formulations. They argue for blood sampling 24 h after the previous dose rather than the standard 12 h. I interpret the data quite differently.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices-Part 1: Immunogenicity Risk Assessment.

Clin Pharmacol Ther

January 2025

Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech/Roche, South San Francisco, California, USA.

An immunogenicity risk assessment (IRA) is a relatively new expectation of health authorities that is increasingly incorporated into the drug development process across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry. The guiding principle for an IRA includes a comprehensive evaluation of product- and patient-related factors that may influence the immunogenic potential of a biotherapeutic drug and a potential action plan. The Immunogenicity Working Group from the IQ Consortium (Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group) has conducted a survey to understand the current practices for conducting IRAs and relevant aspects of bioanalysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Given the challenges of pediatric antibacterial therapy, it is crucial to formulate antibiotics with a lower potential for interaction with dietary interventions and tailor them for optimal administration in children. Chemometric methods allow us to analyze multiple interrelated variables simultaneously and uncover correlations.

Aim: We applied a chemometric approach to examine how food, beverages, antacids, and mineral supplements affect antibiotic bioavailability in adults and children, aiming to explore relationships between antibiotic structure, physicochemical properties, and post-meal changes in pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!