A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Diagnosis accuracy of a new challenger for thrombosis exclusion, the Stratus CS DDMR. | LitMetric

Diagnosis accuracy of a new challenger for thrombosis exclusion, the Stratus CS DDMR.

Clin Chim Acta

Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.

Published: April 2005

Background: The diagnostic accuracy of a new Point of Care, rapid and quantitative D-dimer assay (Stratus CS DDMR from Dade Behring) was evaluated.

Methods: Vidas test from bioMerieux was used as reference method in 279 patients recruited from a management study in progress in our institution.

Results: Both assays show comparable reproducibility (2.9% with the Stratus CS DDMR and 4.4% with the D-dimer Vidas in the cut-off range) and good correlation (R(2)=0.9057). The overall test performance as assessed by the area under the curve of the ROC curves is 0.801 for the Stratus CS DDMR assay and 0.798 for the D-dimer Vidas assay. By using assay regression curves, likelihood ratios or test agreement approaches, a 440-450 ng/ml value is evidenced as the threshold value for the Stratus CS DDMR, which nears at best the performances of the D-dimer Vidas 500 or 550 ng/ml threshold value. This proposed exclusion value ensures a 95% sensitivity and a 45% specificity. The few false negative results using the two assays only evidenced sub-popliteal thromboses, that would not have been considered as having thrombosis if an above-the-knee test had been performed. In these conditions, sensitivity would have been 100%.

Conclusions: A new quantitative D-dimer assay, the Stratus CS DDMR, demonstrated performances comparable with those of the DD Vidas test.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cccn.2004.11.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stratus ddmr
24
d-dimer vidas
12
quantitative d-dimer
8
d-dimer assay
8
assay stratus
8
vidas test
8
stratus
6
ddmr
6
d-dimer
5
assay
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!