Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes induced by Twin-block appliance for treatment of Class II,division I malocclusions in growing children.

Methods: Twelve patients with Class II, division I malocclusions aged 10 to 12 years were investigated. The records were evaluated and compared with an age-matched sample of untreated Class II control subjects. The follow-up period was 12 months. Group t test was used for comparison.

Results: In the treatment group, the upper incisors retroclination of the upper incisors and the mandibular forward movement contributed more to the overjet reduction. The skeletal and dental effects changes molar correction were almost similar. The mandibular growth in the treatment group was 2.29 mm, greater than that in the control group. The posterior facial height and the anterior lower facial height increased by 2.28 mm and 2.58 mm respectively. On the other hand, unfavorable vertical changes were not observed.

Conclusions: The treatment of Class II division I malocclusion with Twin-block appliance was effective in reducing overjet, correcting molar relationship and improving soft tissue profile. It can also enhance mandibular growth.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

twin-block appliance
12
treatment class
12
class division
12
appliance treatment
8
division malocclusion
8
treatment group
8
upper incisors
8
mandibular growth
8
facial height
8
treatment
5

Similar Publications

While polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) is widely used in orthodontic appliances such as clear aligners and retainers, there is limited experimental data assessing its performance under functional stresses, such as those encountered during dental movements and palatal expansion. This study aims to evaluate the ability of PETG thermoplastic material to withstand deformation under functional and expansion forces, specifically within the context of orthodontic applications. To estimate the firmness of the screw within the appliance, a universal Instron testing machine was used to record the forces released by each activation of the expander within the upper part of 10 clear modified twin blocks (MTBs) made from PETG and compare it with that released by 10 conventional twin blocks (CTBs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Twin block appliances are commonly used to treat skeletal class II malocclusion. However, many adverse effects, such as lower incisor protrusion and a bulky nature, can be observed. To overcome these effects, a modified twin block was designed, which uses vacuum-formed hard plates (VFPs) instead of acrylic plates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study aimed to compare the effects of two orthodontic appliances, the Twin block and Herbst, on the structure of the mandible using fractal dimension analysis (FDA) of panoramic radiographs in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion.
  • Fifty subjects treated with each appliance and a control group were analyzed, focusing on specific regions in the mandible, with significant changes in the condylar region and corpus observed across both treatment groups.
  • Results indicated that both appliances caused remodeling of the mandibular trabecular structure, with the Twin block showing greater variances in the condyle compared to the Herbst appliance, thus rejecting the null hypothesis of no effect.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare the variations in the upper airway of children with skeletal Class II mandibular retrognathism treated with van Beek Headgear-Activator (vBHGA) and Twin-Block (TB) appliances.

Materials And Methods: 40 children were involved in this retrospective study and divided into two intervention groups: the vBHGA group and the TB group, each comprising 20 individuals with an average age of 11.13 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Post-graduate resident turnover in public and teaching hospital orthodontic clinics often leads to challenges in maintaining the same level of efficacy when a care provider changes during orthodontic treatment. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the duration and quality of treatment outcomes between two patient groups: the transfer group, who underwent orthodontic care from multiple residents, and the non-transfer group, whose entire treatment was overseen by a single resident.

Methods: Sixty-six patients were enrolled and equally divided into transfer and non-transfer groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!