Aims: All convective hemodiafiltration techniques require a replacement fluid, which must have an adequate electrolytic composition and must be sterile and pyrogen-free. Using an integrated adsorption cartridge, the ultrafiltrate can be "regenerated" and used as a replacement fluid (hemo-filtrate reinfusion; HFR). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the HFR technique as suggested in its original configuration could be improved by inverting the purification sequence (post-dilution HFR; PDHFR) in order to increase the purification efficiency of the whole system.
Methods: We performed standard HFR in 6 uremic patients during 6 months and, subsequently, during further 6 months, PDHFR. The dialytic efficacy of the two techniques and the filter blood loss were evaluated. Moreover, we studied how both techniques affected cytokine levels.
Results: We observed a significant increase of urea extraction and of Kt/V values in PDHFR. An equally significant improvement was observed in regard to the extraction of beta2-m and the blood loss. Furthermore, IL6 and TNFalpha decreased significantly after PDHFR treatment.
Conclusions: HFR has proven to be an easy-to-perform hemodiafiltration technique, capable of resolving the typical problem of the other hemodiafiltration technique, the availability and production of a sterile and ultrapure reinfusion solution. The inversion of its configuration has allowed us to improve three aspects that have characterized, in our experience, the treatments performed in the original geometry: the removal of both urea and beta2-m, and the filter. Finally, it's notable that the decrease in cytokines levels achieved with PDHFR might attenuate the uremic micro-inflammatory state.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/cnp63106 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!