There has been debate about whether differential delay eyeblink conditioning can be acquired without awareness of the stimulus contingencies. In 4 experiments, the authors reexamined this question. Older participants were tested with a tone and white noise (Experiment 1) or with 2 tones (Experiment 2). In addition, younger participants were tested with 2 tones (Experiment 3) or with 2 tones plus the parameters from an earlier study that had reported a relationship between conditioning and awareness (Experiment 4). Participants who were designated aware of the stimulus contingencies and participants who were designated unaware exhibited equivalent levels of differential eyeblink conditioning. Awareness of stimulus contingencies is not required for differential delay eyeblink conditioning when simple conditioned stimuli are used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2773180PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.78DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differential delay
12
delay eyeblink
12
eyeblink conditioning
12
stimulus contingencies
12
awareness stimulus
8
participants tested
8
experiment tones
8
tones experiment
8
conditioning awareness
8
participants designated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!