Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening outside of low-resource settings.

Rev Panam Salud Publica

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Published: January 2005

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) as a screening method for cervical cancer in a well-equipped health center in Peru, comparing it to the traditional Pap smear.
  • VIA resulted in a higher positive test rate (6.9% vs. 4.2%) compared to Pap smear, and detected more cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
  • The findings suggest that VIA is effective for early detection and is more likely to ensure follow-up than the Pap smear, showing its potential use in both low-resource and well-equipped settings.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To assess visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) as a screening tool for use in a well-equipped health center in Peru, to evaluate VIA as an alternative or adjunct to the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, and to determine if VIA can play a role in settings other than low-resource ones.

Methods: This was a prospective study of 1 921 asymptomatic women living in Lima, Peru, carried out in 1999 and 2000. The study was performed at a cancer center equipped with the latest-generation technology and highly trained oncologists. The women underwent a complete clinical evaluation, including a Pap smear and VIA. Participants with any positive test were referred for colposcopy and biopsy.

Results: More women tested positive by VIA than on the Pap smear (6.9% vs. 4.2%; P = 0.0001). There were 35 women with histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN 1); of these, 15 were detected by Pap and 20 by VIA (P = 0.4). A diagnosis of CIN 2 or 3 (CIN 2-3) was confirmed in a total of 13 cases; Pap detected 5 of the cases and VIA 11 of the cases (P = 0.06). The positive predictive value for detection of CIN 2+ was 8.3% for VIA and 6.3% for Pap (P = 0.5). Most importantly, while only 2.3% of patients with a positive VIA were lost to follow-up before colposcopy, that was true for 26.3% of the women with a positive Pap smear (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: VIA is useful for detection of precursor lesions of cervical cancer not only in low-resource settings but also in well-equipped health centers and cancer centers. In these non-low-resource settings, VIA has a positive predictive value comparable to the conventional Pap smear, but it is more likely to achieve earlier diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment than cytology-based screening.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1020-49892005000100001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pap smear
20
visual inspection
8
inspection acetic
8
acetic acid
8
cervical cancer
8
low-resource settings
8
well-equipped health
8
pap
8
positive pap
8
positive predictive
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!