Guidelines were developed for data collection from medical records for use in retrospective analyses.

J Clin Epidemiol

Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Room F4-159.2, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Published: March 2005

AI Article Synopsis

  • Guidelines were developed for accurately collecting data from medical records, which are primarily meant for patient care rather than research purposes.
  • The study emphasizes the need for a well-designed case record form and standardized data collection practices, along with pilot studies and supplemental questionnaires to ensure robust research findings.
  • An independent adjudication committee is recommended to help interpret clinical outcomes and mitigate potential biases in the data.

Article Abstract

Objective: To construct a set of guidelines for data collection from medical records.

Study Design And Setting: Retrospective analysis of clinical data is often performed by physician-scientists. In such research, the source of clinical data is the patient's medical record; however, medical records are intended for patient care and the data are not systematically recorded for research purposes. We drew on recommendations in the literature and our own experience with a retrospective cohort study that uses a DNA bank to construct guidelines for data collection from medical records.

Results: The guidelines incorporate a number of strategies for accurate data collection, which are discussed and illustrated by application.

Conclusion: With guidelines for data collection, the quality of research data is enhanced. A well-designed case record form and a handbook for standardized data collection are essential for training the data collectors and for ensuring fastidious searching of the record; however, certain kinds of information are not always well documented in patient records. Consequently, it is essential to perform a pilot study to assess the study design and to use additional questionnaires. Correct interpretation of clinical outcomes documented in the medical records often necessitates an independent adjudication committee to prevent bias in outcome definition.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

data collection
24
collection medical
12
medical records
12
guidelines data
12
data
11
clinical data
8
collection
6
medical
6
guidelines
5
guidelines developed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!