Background: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II, multicenter study was to optimize the initial oral dose of tacrolimus.
Methods: A total of 113 patients were randomly assigned to initial low-dose (0.075 mg/kg/day, n=55) or high-dose (0.15 mg/kg/day, n=58) oral tacrolimus and followed for 3 months. Target whole-blood trough levels were 10 to 20 ng/mL. Prophylactic use of corticosteroids and azathioprine was identical in both groups, and antibody induction was mandatory. The primary endpoint was the time to and incidence of the initial oral tacrolimus dose adjustment because of toxicity or rejection, or withdrawal before initial dose change. Efficacy was assessed by the occurrence of biopsy-proven rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or =1B).
Results: In the primary endpoint, no significant difference was observed between the low- and high-dose groups. After 3 months, there was no difference in freedom from initial oral tacrolimus dose change because of rejection, toxicity, or withdrawal (89.0% vs. 87.6%; not significant [NS]). In both groups, dose adjustments were mainly required to achieve and maintain target blood levels (80.0% vs. 82.8%; NS). Patient survival was 92.7% and 98.3% (NS). There was no significant difference between groups regarding freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection (57.1% vs. 66.3%; NS). The overall safety profiles indicated a tendency toward better tolerability in the low-dose group.
Conclusions: Although low-dose and high-dose tacrolimus had similar efficacy, low-dose tacrolimus was associated with a more favorable safety profile. Therefore we recommend starting tacrolimus therapy after antibody induction at 0.075 mg/kg and adjust dose according to whole-blood trough levels.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000140965.83682.d6 | DOI Listing |
Int J Implant Dent
January 2025
Center of Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Purpose: This systematic review aims to assess the performance, methodological quality and reporting transparency in prediction models for the dental implant's complications and survival rates.
Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Peer-reviewed studies that developed prediction models for dental implant's complications and survival rate were included.
J Am Coll Cardiol
December 2024
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Outpatient worsening heart failure (HF), defined by initiation or intensification of diuretics, is adversely prognostic for patients with either reduced or preserved ejection fraction.
Objectives: This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of outpatient worsening HF in transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy and the effect of patisiran treatment.
Methods: Post hoc analyses of the APOLLO-B trial (NCT03997383) evaluated the associations between outpatient worsening HF (defined by oral diuretic initiation or intensification), measures of disease progression, and a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events.
Clin Oral Implants Res
January 2025
Perioplastic Institute, Santiago, Chile.
Purpose: To identify the current status and development of zirconia barriers in bone augmentation procedures in the maxillofacial area of adult human patients.
Materials And Methods: Two independent reviewers conducted an electronic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, the Cochrane Library, and LILACS databases, as well as a manual search to identify eligible clinical studies up to April 15, 2024. The protocol was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.
ACR Open Rheumatol
January 2025
Amgen, Inc (formerly Horizon Therapeutics plc), Deerfield, Illinois.
Objective: Patients with uncontrolled gout have few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) levels, but antidrug antibodies limit SU-lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) cotherapy increases pegloticase response rates and lowers IR risk in pegloticase-naïve patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAfr J Prim Health Care Fam Med
December 2024
School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town.
Background: Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uses antiretroviral medication to reduce HIV risk in HIV-negative individuals. Despite its effectiveness, global uptake faces policy and accessibility challenges. In Eswatini, PrEP introduction in 2017 showed promise despite stigma and COVID-19 disruptions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!