Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Therapeutic angiogenesis has yielded promising results in animal models, including the demonstration of newly created blood vessels, increased perfusion and functional benefits. On the other hand, clinical studies using similar methods of angiogenesis have so far been disappointing. The possibility that endothelial dysfunction may play a role in this bench-to-bedside discrepancy has led to further research on the role of endothelial-derived mediators in the angiogenic cascade. One of these mediators is nitric oxide (NO), which plays an integral role in the development and maintenance of a microvascular network and whose local availability is altered in endothelial dysfunction. This article outlines the role of NO in the angiogenic response and discusses possible therapeutic options to optimise endothelial dysfunction and NO availability in patients undergoing angiogenic therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/13543784.14.1.37 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!