Hyperlipidaemia is a pivotal risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic disease. A large number of studies have demonstrated that the treatment of abnormalities in lipoprotein levels reduces the risk for myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, carotid artery disease, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Despite the development of multiple drug classes to treat dyslipidaemias and the promulgation of clearly defined guidelines for the management of lipid disorders, dyslipidaemia tends to be undertreated in the majority of patients at risk for cardiovascular disease. A part of the reluctance to treat different lipoprotein fractions to goal levels is attributable to physician- and patient-related concerns over the increasing toxicity of available therapies, as their dosages are increased. The risks of hepatotoxicity, myalgia, and rhabdomyolysis are fairly well characterised in patients receiving statins, fibrates and niacin. Another issue affecting treatment success rates is the fact that many patients with complex dyslipidaemias are inadequately responsive to single-agent therapy. As the epidemics of obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus continue to worsen, physicians will encounter severe, mixed dyslipidaemias more frequently. Many of these patients will require combinations of drugs to address the various metabolic derangements causing changes in multiple lipoprotein fractions. Although the need for combination therapy is well-established in the management of disorders, such as hypertension and diabetes, it is less often used for the treatment of dyslipidaemias. The development of safe, cost-effective, and efficacious combination dyslipidaemic therapy is an important goal in cardiovascular medicine. Simvastatin plus ezetimibe has recently been combined as a fixed dose therapy, which offers clinicians the opportunity to simultaneously inhibit two key pathways in cholesterol metabolism: hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis and the absorption of cholesterol at the level of the proximal jejunum. This dual mechanism of inhibition substantially increases the capacity to decrease serum levels of atherogenic low-density lipoproteins and increase high-density lipoprotein, compared with that observed when either drug is used alone. This combination increases the likelihood of therapeutic success in patients with dyslipidaemia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14656566.6.1.131DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

simvastatin ezetimibe
8
combination therapy
8
lipoprotein fractions
8
therapy
5
patients
5
combination
4
ezetimibe combination
4
therapy management
4
management dyslipidaemia
4
dyslipidaemia hyperlipidaemia
4

Similar Publications

Drugs for dyslipidaemia: the legacy effect of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S).

Lancet

December 2024

School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Cardiometabolic Service, Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.

Since the discovery of statins and the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) results three decades ago, remarkable advances have been made in the treatment of dyslipidaemia, a major risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Safe and effective statins remain the cornerstone of therapeutic approach for this indication, including for children with genetic dyslipidaemia, and are one of the most widely prescribed drugs in the world. However, despite the affordability of generic statins, they remain underutilised worldwide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation of the role of metabolizing enzymes and transporter variants in ezetimibe pharmacokinetics.

Front Pharmacol

October 2024

Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain.

Article Synopsis
  • Ezetimibe is a drug that helps reduce cholesterol levels by blocking its absorption in the intestines, but there are currently no established pharmacogenetic guidelines for its use.
  • The study involved 96 healthy participants from different trials and focused on 49 genetic variants in 22 genes to determine their impact on ezetimibe's effects.
  • Although no strong links were found between genetic variants and ezetimibe's metabolism, some variants showed potential significance in further analyses, suggesting the need for more research in the future.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤40 ml/m² in men and ≤32 ml/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS (CGASEL and DGASEL) based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area (energy loss, EL).

Methods: Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4m/s and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigated how different statins affect the risk of developing glaucoma, a serious eye condition.
  • The researchers conducted a thorough analysis of data from various medical databases covering a wide range of cholesterol-lowering medications and their relationship with glaucoma.
  • Results showed that rosuvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin significantly increased the risk of glaucoma compared to a placebo, suggesting caution for patients at risk when these statins are prescribed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Analysis of composite time-to-event endpoints in cardiovascular outcome trials.

Clin Trials

October 2024

Clinical Biostatistics, Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA, USA.

Composite time-to-event endpoints are commonly used in cardiovascular outcome trials. For example, the IMPROVE-IT trial comparing ezetimibe+simvastatin to placebo+simvastatin in 18,144 patients with acute coronary syndrome used a primary composite endpoint with five component outcomes: (1) cardiovascular death, (2) non-fatal stroke, (3) non-fatal myocardial infarction, (4) coronary revascularization ≥30 days after randomization, and (5) unstable angina requiring hospitalization. In such settings, the traditional analysis compares treatments using the observed time to the occurrence of the first (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!