Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
When people interact with products, all sensory modalities are open to receive information. To assess each modality's potential contribution to overall product experiences, we developed a split-modality approach, in which subjects experienced real-life products through only one modality: vision, touch, audition, or olfaction. Responses focused on (1) description of the sensory experience, (2) product identification, and (3) descriptions of associations and memories linked to this experience. Visual and tactual information were most detailed, made product identification easiest, and yielded the clearest memories of past events, associations to persons, and associations with other products. Because vision may have an advantage over touch by the speed with which information is processed, vision is likely to dominate product experiences in real-life situations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!