A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Treating metastatic vertebral tumor with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a report of 28 cases]. | LitMetric

[Treating metastatic vertebral tumor with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a report of 28 cases].

Ai Zheng

Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital/Yunnan Provincial Tumor Hospital, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan, 650118, P. R. China.

Published: February 2005

Background & Objective: Treating metastatic vertebral tumor is a common difficulty. Conservative treatment can't efficiently release the pain, and establish the spinal column; while operation may destroy normal tissue, and cause many complications, which would prolong the time of in-hospital, and delay the treatment of primary disease, at the same time, operation is not suitable for multiple metastatic spinal tumors. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) on metastatic spinal tumor under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods: A total of 58 patients with metastatic spinal tumor were divided into 2 groups according to their intention, 28 (group A) were treated with PVP combined radiochemotherapy, 30 (group B) were treated with routine radiochemotherapy. Baselines of the 2 groups have no significant difference. Two months after treatment, the life quality, therapeutic response, stabilization of the vertebral column, and toxic effect were compared between group A and group B.

Results: After treatment, both groups showed significant changes in life quality, and therapeutic response (P < 0.05, t(1)=2.74, t(2)=11.74). Group A showed no complication. Group B showed 5 cases of pathologic constrictive fracture in spinal body.

Conclusion: PVP is a simple and minimally invasive treatment with few complications, which can release pain, decrease incidence of pathologic constrictive fracture in spinal body, and improve life quality of patients with metastatic spinal tumor.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metastatic spinal
16
spinal tumor
12
life quality
12
metastatic vertebral
8
vertebral tumor
8
percutaneous vertebroplasty
8
release pain
8
patients metastatic
8
group treated
8
quality therapeutic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!