Eight- to 12-month-olds might make A-not-B errors, knowing the object is in B but searching at A because of ancillary (attention, inhibitory, or motor memory) deficits, or they might genuinely believe the object is in A (conceptual deficit). This study examined how diligently infants searched for a hidden object they never found. An object was placed in A twice, and then in B. In a different task the object was placed beside A twice, and then in B. Infants made more A-not-B errors in the former task, and perseverating infants searched diligently in A rather than in B. Infants seemed to believe the object was in A, suggesting that both a conceptual deficit and ancillary deficits account for A-not-B errors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00834.x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Object permanence in rooks (Corvus frugilegus): Individual differences and behavioral considerations.
Learn Behav
September 2024
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Piagetian object permanence (OP) refers to the ability to know that an object continues to exist when out of sight: In humans, it develops in six stages. Species of great apes, other mammals, and birds (parrots, corvids, and pigeons) have been shown to possess partial or full OP, which is a prerequisite for more complex physical cognition abilities they may possess. In birds, the greatest variation is in Stage 6 (invisible displacements) and in "A-not-B" errors-incorrectly persevering in searching an empty location rewarded previously.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMotor constraints on infant search: The impact of reaching around a barrier on search performance.
J Exp Child Psychol
January 2024
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada. Electronic address:
This study investigated the impact of perceptual-motor context on a classic paradigm used to assess cognitive-spatial reasoning. Specifically, this project explored the effect on search behavior of reaching around a barrier versus not reaching around a barrier during the A portion in the B phase of the well-known A-not-B task. In examining 8- and 16-month-old infants, this study found that both age groups demonstrated poorer performance on A trials when needing to reach around a barrier than when there was no barrier present.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGoats show higher behavioural flexibility than sheep in a spatial detour task.
R Soc Open Sci
March 2021
Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
The ability to adapt to changing environments is crucial for survival and has evolved based on socio-ecological factors. Goats and sheep are closely related, with similar social structures, body sizes and domestication levels, but different feeding ecologies, i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDogs' insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy.
Sci Rep
January 2021
School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Executive function plays a critical role in regulating behaviour. Behaviour which directs attention towards the correct solution leads to increased executive function performance in children, but it is unknown how other animals respond to such scaffolding behaviour. Dogs were presented with an A-not-B detour task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCats show an unexpected pattern of response to human ostensive cues in a series of A-not-B error tests.
Anim Cogn
July 2020
Department of Ethology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
It is an intriguing question whether cats' social understanding capacity, including the sensitivity to ostensive signals (resulting in fast preferential learning of behavioural choices demonstrated by humans), would be comparable to that in dogs. In a series of A-not-B error tests, we investigated whether the ostensive or non-ostensive manner of human communication and the familiarity of the human demonstrator would affect the search error pattern in companion cats. Cats' performance showed an almost completely different distribution of perseverative erring than earlier was shown in dogs and human infants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!