AI Article Synopsis

  • High-protein and acidogenic diets lead to higher calcium excretion, which can negatively impact bone metabolism.
  • A study with 13 participants found that those consuming an amino acid and carbohydrate supplement had increased markers of bone resorption during bed rest compared to a control group.
  • The amino acid group showed higher urinary calcium and lower total bone mineral content after 28 days of bed rest, indicating increased bone resorption without changes in bone formation.

Article Abstract

High-protein and acidogenic diets induce hypercalciuria. Foods or supplements with excess sulfur-containing amino acids increase endogenous sulfuric acid production and therefore have the potential to increase calcium excretion and alter bone metabolism. In this study, effects of an amino acid/carbohydrate supplement on bone resorption were examined during bed rest. Thirteen subjects were divided at random into two groups: a control group (Con, n = 6) and an amino acid-supplemented group (AA, n = 7) who consumed an extra 49.5 g essential amino acids and 90 g carbohydrate per day for 28 days. Urine was collected for n-telopeptide (NTX), deoxypyridinoline (DPD), calcium, and pH determinations. Bone mineral content was determined and potential renal acid load was calculated. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was measured in serum samples collected on day 1 (immediately before bed rest) and on day 28. Potential renal acid load was higher in the AA group than in the Con group during bed rest (P < 0.05). For all subjects, during bed rest urinary NTX and DPD concentrations were greater than pre-bed rest levels (P < 0.05). Urinary NTX and DPD tended to be higher in the AA group (P = 0.073 and P = 0.056, respectively). During bed rest, urinary calcium was greater than baseline levels (P < 0.05) in the AA group but not the Con group. Total bone mineral content was lower after bed rest than before bed rest in the AA group but not the Con group (P < 0.05). During bed rest, urinary pH decreased (P < 0.05), and it was lower in the AA group than the Con group. These data suggest that bone resorption increased, without changes in bone formation, in the AA group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01406.2004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bed rest
32
group con
20
con group
16
group
12
rest urinary
12
rest
9
bone metabolism
8
amino acids
8
bone resorption
8
bed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!