Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@remsenmedia.com&api_key=81853a771c3a3a2c6b2553a65bc33b056f08&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Linear left atrial ablation is performed in combination with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation to improve the clinical results of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. These procedures require long procedures and fluoroscopic exposure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of a new, nonfluoroscopic, real-time, three-dimensional navigation system for linear ablation at the left atrial roof and mitral isthmus. The study included 44 patients (54 +/- 10 years of age, 5 women) with drug-refractory AF, who underwent roof line or mitral isthmus linear ablation after 4-PV isolation. In 22 patients, ablation was performed with the navigation system (test group), and in the remainders linear ablation was performed with fluoroscopic guidance alone (control group). Conduction block was achieved in 20 patients (91%) in test group, and 21 patients (95%) in the control group (ns). Use of the navigation system was associated with a shorter fluoroscopic exposure for roof line (5.6 +/- 3.0 minutes vs 8.7 +/- 5.0 minutes, P < 0.05), and a trend for mitral isthmus ablation (7.8 +/- 7.8 minutes vs 12.1 +/- 5.9 minutes). It was also associated with a trend toward shorter procedure times for roof line (15.3 +/- 8.6 minutes vs 22.9 +/- 16.8 minutes) and mitral isthmus line (20.2 +/- 15.8 minutes vs 32.0 +/- 7.6 minutes) but no difference in duration of radiofrequency delivery. There was no procedural complication. The use of this new nonfluoroscopic imaging system was associated with a shorter fluoroscopic exposure as well as a trend toward shorter duration of linear ablation procedures for AF.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00036.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!