A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Life raft entry from water: effect of strength, tallness, and weight burden in men and women. | LitMetric

Life raft entry from water: effect of strength, tallness, and weight burden in men and women.

Aviat Space Environ Med

Human Modelling Group, SMART, Defence R&D Canada-Toronto, P.O. Box 2000, 1133 Sheppard Ave. West, Toronto, ON, Canada M3M 3B9.

Published: January 2005

Background: The recurring failure of survivors of accidental water immersion to self-board a life raft prompted us to quantify the requisite physical attributes for successful self-boarding for predictive purposes.

Methods: There were 24 men and 24 women (18 to 52 yr) who attempted to self-board an inflated double-tube life raft using ladder, ramp, and over-the-side (OTS) entry methods while wearing a lifejacket in warm, calm water. The OTS method was also tested under weight-bearing conditions to determine the subject's 'reserve' capacity (i.e., maximum additional load capacity).

Results: Out of the 24 men, 22 successfully boarded the life raft, as did 17 out of the 24 women, using all methods of entry, and their reserve capacities ranged from 2 to 23% of body mass. Men reported lower efforts of exertion and were faster than women when using the ladder or boarding OTS without weights. There were no gender differences in these measures for the ramp and weighted OTS methods of entry. Strength and tallness were positive attributes for boarding the life raft using the ladder and OTS methods of entry, but not when using the ramp, which was the easiest and fastest entry method to execute.

Conclusions: Men were more successful in boarding the life raft OTS (approximately 90%) compared with women (approximately 70%), but the difference was less pronounced for the ladder and ramp entry methods. The subjects' limited reserve capacities suggest that heavy layers of wet clothing and/or loss of muscle strength can easily compromise an individual's ability to self-board a life raft.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

life raft
28
methods entry
12
strength tallness
8
men women
8
self-board life
8
raft ladder
8
ladder ramp
8
entry methods
8
reserve capacities
8
ots methods
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!