Objective: To determine the incidence and risk factors for rash in Thai patients taking four different non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens.
Methods: HIV-positive, antiretroviral-naive patients enrolled in the 2NN study in Thailand and followed for at least 1 week were included. Patients were randomized to efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg once daily (OD) versus nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg twice daily (BD) versus NVP 400 mg OD versus NVP 400 mg OD + EFV 800 mg OD with stavudine/lamivudine.
Results: Of 202 patients, 95 (47%) and 69 (34.2%) developed a rash from all reasons and from NNRTI, respectively. For NNRTI-related rash the incidences were EFV (20%), NVP BD (21%), NVP OD (38%) and NVP + EFV (67%). The proportions of patients with grade I, II and III within the four treatment arms are as follows: EFV, 4.3, 13 and 2.9%; NVP BD, 2.3, 15.9 and 2.3%; NVP OD, 12.8, 19.1 and 6.4%; and NVP + EFV, 11.9, 47.6 and 7.1%. Multivariate analyses showed females with CD4 cell count > or =250 x 10 cells/l, high body mass index (>21.3 kg/m), and a rise in CD4 (> or =53 x 10 cells/l) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (> or =34 U/l) at week 4 to be risk factors for rash.
Conclusions: Thai patients had a high incidence of NNRTI-related rash when treated with NVP + EFV or NVP OD. NVP if used BD had the same rash incidence as EFV for rash of all grades. Females, and persons with earlier HIV disease or with a large rise in CD4+ cell count after starting therapy are at greater risk for NNRTI-related rash.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200501280-00011 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute Landmark Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is increasingly used for obesity and metabolic disease, with safety profiles showing it is among the safest major operations. The last 20 + years have noted significantly improved safety that has been accompanied by decreasing length of stay and select populations electing for outpatient surgery, leading to continued decreases in cost. Regardless, readmissions and complications still occur, requiring inpatient postoperative care (IP-POC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAIDS Behav
January 2025
Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRC/UVRI & LSHTM) Uganda Research Unit, Kampala, Uganda.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven to be a powerful tool in preventing HIV infection. There is limited information about the factors associated with willingness to use different PrEP modalities among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Africa. We assessed willingness to use long-acting injectable PrEP (LAI-PrEP) among 14-24-year-old AGYW at high risk of HIV in Uganda, and associated factors determined using multivariable complementary log-log regression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAIDS Behav
January 2025
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE Atlanta GA, Atlanta, 30322, USA.
This study aimed to explore the awareness, willingness, and engagement with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among high-risk Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM) and to investigate the factors influencing its use. A cross-sectional survey of 1800 HIV-negative MSM was conducted in Chengdu, Suzhou, and Wuhan between June 2022 and February 2023 through in-person and online recruitment methods. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of PrEP use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Biotechnol (Singap)
January 2025
National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
The co-circulation of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 has led to co-infection events, primarily affecting children and older adults, who are at higher risk for severe disease. Although co-infection prevalence is relatively low, it is associated with worse outcomes compared to mono-infections. Previous studies have shown that the outcomes of co-infection depend on multiple factors, including viral interference, virus-host interaction and host response.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!