A key issue in near infrared spectroscopy (NIR) is the possibility to use calibrations generated on one instrument for predictions on others. A number of methods for calibration transfer have been proposed, but which method to choose is typically not straightforward. An evaluation of a number of methods for transferring quantitative calibrations between different instruments was carried out on near infrared diffuse-reflectance data from a pharmaceutical formulation. Six instruments were included in the study, five of which were scanning grating instruments, both with and without fibre-optic probe configuration, and one of which was a Fourier-transform instrument, equipped with a fibre-optic probe. The results show that it is possible to transfer calibrations between different instruments, provided that a structured procedure is used. Simple techniques for calibration transfer, such as slope/bias correction on the predicted results, as well as standard normal variate transformation and local centring of the raw spectra, gave considerably lower prediction errors on transfer than did standardisation with a certified diffuse-reflectance standard, or direct transfer without any transfer function. Notably, including more than one instrument in the calibration also improved the prediction ability of the models on calibration transfer. No significant differences in wavelength scale were found when a certified diffuse-reflectance wavelength standard was measured on the instruments studied. Nor did simulated wavelength scale differences below +/-0.3 nm cause any significant change in the prediction errors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2004.09.046 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!