Objective: To investigate the effect of three postoperative dressings on orthopaedic wound healing.

Method: Three hundred orthopaedic patients were divided into three treatment groups and allocated to management with one of three dressings: Primapore, Tegaderm with pad, and OpSite Post-Op. Staff completed a questionnaire to evaluate the wound progression. Outcome measures were the presence of infection, blistering and the number of dressing changes required.

Results: There was a significantly lower incidence of blistering with OpSite Post-Op (6%) than Tegaderm with pad (16%) and Primapore (24%) (p<0.001). Patients in the OpSite Post-Op group had the lowest exudate levels.

Conclusion: Dressings that employ a clear film and have a high moisture vapour transmission rate have been shown to reduce both the rate of blistering and wound discharge. The additional expense inherent in using such dressings may, in reality, prove cost-effective because of the reduced need for dressings changes and the subsequent earlier discharge of these patients from hospital with an uncomplicated wound.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2005.14.1.26722DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

orthopaedic patients
8
tegaderm pad
8
opsite post-op
8
choice dressing
4
dressing major
4
major impact
4
impact blistering
4
blistering healing
4
healing outcomes
4
outcomes orthopaedic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!