Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Patient non-compliance is a significant contributor to poor blood pressure control. Although measures to improve compliance are known, they are not in routine use.
Objective: To apply measures based on current recommendations in an integrated approach in the 'Manage it well!' (MIW) programme, and to determine the improvement in blood pressure control.
Design And Setting: During the prospective open cohort study, 348 primary and 156 secondary care centres enrolled 6941 hypertensive patients and followed them for 6 months.
Interventions: An integrated intervention package also applicable to everyday practice was introduced to improve treatment adherence, including education programmes for patients and physicians, tight follow-up with frequent office visits and regular home blood pressure measurements. Treatment was based on either trandolapril or verapamil SR with dose titration, with added-on therapy if necessary.
Main Outcome Measure: Rates of control of blood pressure to < 140/90 mmHg.
Results: Data were evaluated from 5468 patients, 72% known to have hypertension and 26% newly diagnosed [2% not available (n.a.)]. At baseline only 2.9% of treated patients had their hypertension well controlled (< 140/90 mmHg), but during the programme this increased to 40.9% (P < 0.001). The absolute reduction in office blood pressure was also significant (from 168 +/- 19/97 +/- 11 mmHg to 139 +/- 13/83 +/- 7 mmHg; P < 0.001). No differences in blood pressure control were found between trandolapril and verapamil SR regimens. Office blood pressure was greater than home blood pressure at baseline (168 +/- 19/97 +/- 11 mmHg compared with 151 +/- 17/89 +/- 10 mmHg; P < 0.001), but this difference disappeared at 6 months (139 +/- 13/83 +/- 7 mmHg compared with 140 +/- 13/84 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively).
Conclusions: The integrated, patient-focused approach used in the MIW programme significantly increases the success of treatment in a 'real-world' setting.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200501000-00031 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!