Pressed scar tissue for tympanic membrane grafting in revision tympanoplasty.

Objective: Compare the efficacy of pressed scar tissue grafts to standard fascia and areolar tissue grafts for use in tympanoplasty.

Study Design: A retrospective review of a prospective computerized database of tympanoplasty and mastoid surgeries at an academic, tertiary care practice was performed. Search parameters were set to find all patients who underwent tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy with use of various grafting materials for repair of tympanic membrane perforation from 1996 to 2002. All ages were included. Patients with cholesteatoma at the time of surgery were excluded. The short-term graft take rate was evaluated at 30 to 90 days to identify any differences in results using the standard fascia and areolar grafts vs. pressed scar tissue grafts. Other parameters that may have an influence on outcome were analyzed including mastoidectomy, infection, perforation size, perforation location, age of patient, primary vs. revision surgery, number of previous surgeries, postauricular vs. transcanal approaches, and medial vs. lateral grafting techniques. Hearing results were analyzed to see whether the use of scar tissue grafts resulted in equivalent outcomes compared to standard graft materials.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in short-term tympanic membrane closure rates in subjects undergoing surgery using standard fascia/areolar tissue grafts and pressed scar tissue grafts. Hearing results were also statistically equivalent regardless of graft material used. The only parameter that was somewhat associated with successful closure of tympanic perforation was use of the postauricular approach compared to the transcanal approach.

Conclusions: Pressed scar tissue grafts are as efficacious as standard fascia and areolar tissue grafts when used to repair tympanic membrane perforations. Pressed scar tissue graft can be used successfully in cases such as revision tympanoplasty when standard tissue grafts are not available or difficult to obtain.

Ebm Rating: B-3.