A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Outpatient hysteroscopy: an observational study of patient acceptability. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how acceptable outpatient hysteroscopy is for patients when using Prilocaine as pain relief and whether the current practice of administering it only when indicated by pain is suitable.
  • Participants were 100 women who completed pain questionnaires post-procedure, revealing that those who received Prilocaine reported significantly more pain during the procedure, leading to a preference for general anesthesia.
  • The findings suggest that pain greatly impacts patients' acceptance of the procedure, indicating that the selective use of Prilocaine may not be appropriate, and future research should focus on optimizing pain management strategies.

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess the patient acceptability of outpatient hysteroscopy when Prilocaine is used as analgesia and to determine if our practice of using Prilocaine only if indicated by pain is appropriate.

Material And Methods: Prospective observational study of 100 consecutive patients undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy.

Results: One hundred consecutive women attending for outpatient hysteroscopy, completed questionnaires after the procedure, indicating the level of pain experienced on an analogue scale. Prilocaine hydrochloride (40 mg/ml) had been administered as an intracervical block only if a patient experienced pain or if cervical dilatation was required. Patients expressed significantly more pain during hysteroscopy than after hysteroscopy whether Prilocaine was used or not. The median pain score was significantly higher in the group that required local anesthetic. There was a greater desire to have the procedure done under general anesthesia when Prilocaine was used than when it was not used.

Conclusion: Pain is a determining factor in patient acceptability of outpatient hysteroscopy and is a likely reason for some women to opt to have a hysteroscopy under general anesthesia. The practice of administering Prilocaine only if needed is inappropriate. Future studies should now aim to determine the optimal drug, dose, and timing of administration of analgesia in pre-selected women who are likely to experience pain and hence benefit from analgesia.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

outpatient hysteroscopy
16
patient acceptability
12
observational study
8
acceptability outpatient
8
hysteroscopy prilocaine
8
general anesthesia
8
pain
7
hysteroscopy
6
prilocaine
6
outpatient
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!