Purpose: To explore the health-related and psychological factors that influence decision making about tamoxifen (Nolvadex; AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA) chemoprevention in women at increased risk for developing breast cancer.
Methods: This study involves the assessment of 129 women eligible to take tamoxifen following cancer-risk counseling. Treatment decision and decision satisfaction were measured at 2 and 4 months following counseling. Health-related factors included physician recommendation, personal and family-related health history, and concern about side effects. Psychological factors included breast cancer-related anxiety, risk perception, and depression.
Results: At 2 months' follow-up, 44% of participants declined tamoxifen treatment. This number increased to 49% at 4 months. Personal and family health history were not related to the decision, but history of abnormal biopsy did predict tamoxifen use. Physician recommendation was highly correlated with treatment decision. Concern about side effects was related to the decision to decline treatment. Breast cancer-related anxiety and heightened risk perception were associated with the decision to take tamoxifen. However, anxiety and psychological distress were also negatively related to treatment satisfaction.
Conclusion: Decision-making about tamoxifen is complex, and many eligible women decline treatment or remain undecided. Findings call for further educational follow-up with high-risk women after they undergo initial counseling. Factors related to misperceptions of risk and side effects, as well as psychological distress, may be particularly important targets for intervention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.05.192 | DOI Listing |
Nurs Health Sci
March 2025
Nursing Services Manager, Memorial Health Group Ataşehir, Istanbul, Türkiye.
The aim of this study is to determine the mediating role of moral sensitivity in the effect of nurses' professional values on missed nursing care. A descriptive and correlational study was conducted with 640 nurses working in the inpatient units of a public and a private hospital with the MISSCARE Survey-Turkish, the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire, and the Revised Nursing Professional Values Scale. Data analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 26.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Eval Clin Pract
February 2025
Department of Anatomy, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong, China.
Objective: To examine the medical students' awareness of laparoscopic surgery as well as assess the perceived importance of laparoscopic simulation training, and its impact on students' confidence, career aspirations, proficiency, spatial skills, and physical tolerance.
Design: Descriptive and comparative study using pre- and post-training assessments.
Setting: Simulation training sessions centred on laparoscopic surgery techniques.
J Nephrol
January 2025
School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, UK.
Pain Med
January 2025
IRCCS IstitutoOrtopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) in reducing disability and pain compared to other interventions in chronic spinal pain patients.
Methods: Five databases were queried to October 2023 for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including patients with chronic spinal pain and administering CFT. Primary outcomes were disability and pain.
Integr Cancer Ther
January 2025
Guang 'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!