The aim of the study was to evaluate the osseointegration of Al(2)O(3) coated with a bioactive glass ceramic (BioveritI), in a load-bearing implant model in sheep in comparison to uncoated Al(2)O(3) and to a minimally loaded situation. Both types of implants were inserted into the proximal tibia (load-bearing model) and in a drill hole defect into the tibia diaphysis (minimally loaded model). Under load-bearing conditions, the coating resulted in significantly higher interfacial shear strength and a high amount of mineralized bone in direct contact to the implant surface. In contrast, the uncoated Al(2)O(3) was surrounded by a thick connective tissue layer corresponding to low interfacial shear strength. In the minimally loaded model, however, there was rather a tendency of lower interfacial shear strength in the case of the coated implants. This finding corresponds to the histological results, which showed mineralized bone in the interface of uncoated Al(2)O(3), whereas in the case of the coated implants a thin layer of osteoid was observed. It was suggested that the osseointegration of Al(2)O(3) could be improved by the coating under load-bearing conditions, under which uncoated Al(2)O(3) ceramics cannot directly bind to bone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uncoated al2o3
16
minimally loaded
12
interfacial shear
12
shear strength
12
coating load-bearing
8
osseointegration al2o3
8
loaded model
8
load-bearing conditions
8
mineralized bone
8
case coated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!