Objective: To examine the enabling and constraining factors that influence African social scientists involvement in malaria control.

Methods: Convenience and snowball sampling was used to identify participants. Data collection was conducted in two phases: a mailed survey was followed by in-depth phone interviews with selected individuals chosen from the survey.

Findings: Most participants did not necessarily seek malaria as a career path. Having a mentor who provided research and training opportunities, and developing strong technical skills in malaria control and grant or proposal writing facilitated career opportunities in malaria. A paucity of jobs and funding and inadequate technical skills in malaria limited the type and number of opportunities available to social scientists in malaria control.

Conclusion: Understanding the factors that influence job satisfaction, recruitment and retention in malaria control is necessary for better integration of social scientists into malaria control. However, given the wide array of skills that social scientists have and the variety of deadly diseases competing for attention in Sub Saharan Africa, it might be more cost effective to employ social scientists to work broadly on issues common to communicable diseases in general rather than solely on malaria.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC544396PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-3-47DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

social scientists
24
malaria control
16
scientists malaria
12
malaria
10
african social
8
enabling constraining
8
constraining factors
8
factors influence
8
technical skills
8
skills malaria
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!