A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Non-restorative surgery for rectal cancer: indications in 2003. | LitMetric

Non-restorative surgery for rectal cancer: indications in 2003.

Surgeon

Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN.

Published: December 2003

Background: Although the majority of patients with low rectal tumours can now be offered restorative surgery, a subset of patients with very distal, locally extensive tumours, or excessive comorbidity, continue to require abdominoperineal resection or a Hartmann's procedure. The Clinical Standards Board for Scotland (CSBS) recommends that the permanent stoma rate for patients with rectal cancer should be no more than 40%. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients not suitable for restorative surgery and to explore the remaining indications for non-restorative surgery.

Materials And Methods: Data pertaining to the management of 100 consecutive patients treated for a rectal adenocarcinoma were extracted from a prospective database.

Results: Eighty-one patients underwent primary restorative surgery; 12 patients, 9 of whom had received neoadjuvant therapy, had abdominoperineal excision for low rectal or anorectal tumours. Seven patients with locally extensive disease underwent an unplanned Hartmann's procedure rather than high anterior resection. Two of these resections were incomplete and two patients had metastatic disease not detected on staging.

Conclusion: Not all patients with rectal cancer can avoid the formation of a stoma, but our results show that more than 80% of patients can be offered primary restorative surgery. The CSBS guidelines do not reflect acceptable contemporary practice and should be revised. This is particularly pertinent with the likely introduction of population screening for colorectal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(03)80069-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

restorative surgery
16
rectal cancer
12
patients
11
low rectal
8
locally extensive
8
hartmann's procedure
8
patients rectal
8
primary restorative
8
rectal
6
non-restorative surgery
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!