Participants who reported either low or high self-efficacy for tolerating painful stimuli were randomly assigned to conditions, in which they either did or did not have a choice of strategies for coping with arm shock. Choice and self-efficacy were positively associated with increases in perceived control. Being given a choice, in comparison to having no choice, led to increased tolerance of arm shock and lower pain reports for those with high self-efficacy. Providing a choice of strategies did not benefit those with low self-efficacy. This study demonstrates that the benefits of allowing individuals the opportunity of choosing among an array of coping options depend on a prior conviction that one is able to cope.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:jobm.0000042409.81856.5cDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high self-efficacy
8
choice strategies
8
arm shock
8
self-efficacy
5
choice
5
self-efficacy choice
4
choice coping
4
coping strategies
4
strategies tolerating
4
tolerating acute
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!