Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The microscopic anatomy of the pulmonary circulation was reviewed, comparing the evidence for two competing models, the sheet-and-post paradigm and the tubular paradigm. Implications of the two paradigms were analyzed for function, including flow, recruitment, distension, and diffusion. We conclude that the pulmonary microcirculation is not essentially different from the systemic microcirculation except that two layers of tubular capillaries are arranged on a central layer of connective tissue, the alveolar wall. We find no morphologic basis or theoretic advantage for the sheet-and-post concept.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.4.1131 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!