Objectives Of Study: Several studies have shown that heart failure may benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of right ventricular (RV) bifocal pacing, using two leads at different positions, in similar patient populations. The aim was to evaluate this approach in Chagas disease patients who developed both severe dilated cardiomiopathy and chronic atrial fibrillation.

Methods: The study included 30 patients with a mean age of 52 +/- 6 years (16 male), who had atrioventricular block at functional class II or IV (NYHA). Patients underwent endocardial dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with two RV leads-one placed near the RV outflow tract and the other in the apex. Patients were examined by echocardiography, 24-hour Holter, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class determination before and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after CRT.

Results: Compared to the baseline, the left ventricular ejection fraction increased in the first month of CRT, the left ventricular end diastolic diameter decreased, all patients were downgraded to NYHA class I or II, and the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias decreased. However, these could not be maintained and worsened after 6 months CRT. There was a mortality rate of 43.3% during the first year, and only 23.3% of patients remained alive after 3 years. They underwent an electrophysiological study, which revealed complex arrhythmias justifying implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in six out of seven patients.

Conclusion: The favorable effects of RV bifocal pacing could not be maintained beyond the first 6 months, likely due to the ventricular arrhythmias. Therefore, CRT combined with ICD from the outset may be recommended for this patient group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JICE.0000048569.71590.c5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bifocal pacing
12
ventricular bifocal
8
severe dilated
8
dilated cardiomiopathy
8
chagas disease
8
nyha class
8
left ventricular
8
ventricular arrhythmias
8
patients
7
ventricular
5

Similar Publications

Bifocal coronary sinus pacing and transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation: an innovative combined approach.

Future Cardiol

April 2024

University Cardiology Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, "Aldo Moro" University School of Medicine, Polyclinic University Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, Bari 70124, Italy.

Article Synopsis
  • * The placement of the pacemaker lead in the right ventricle can interfere with the function of the implanted prosthetic valve, potentially causing its dysfunction and requiring alternative pacing locations.
  • * The authors describe a novel combined procedure involving the implantation of two leads in the coronary sinus for effective pacing, alongside a transcatheter procedure to replace a malfunctioning tricuspid bioprosthesis in a young patient.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Simultaneous pacing from two branches of coronary sinus in a patient with prosthetic tricuspid valve and complete heart block.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord

February 2020

Medicine Faculty, Department of Cardiology, Yeni Yuzyil Universty, İstanbul, Turkey.

Background: Complete heart blocks underwent to permanent pacemaker placement are a common complication of tricuspid valve replacement (TVR). If indicated, endocardial placement of a right ventricular (RV) lead is precluded in the presence of mechanical TVR.

Case Presentation: A 20-year-old female patient firstly underwent metallic prosthetic valve operation with tricuspid valve endocarditis in 2014.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation is hampered by difficult placement of the left ventricular (LV) lead. We have routinely used a steerable electrophysiology catheter to guide coronary sinus (CS) cannulation and facilitate LV lead positioning. The aim of this prospective study is to present our results with this approach in 138 consecutive patients receiving a CRT device over 10 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Several implantation strategies have been proposed to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), including bifocal left ventricular (LV) stimulation and optimal single-LV lead placement. This study aimed to compare these two strategies during invasive pressure-volume (PV) loop measurements.

Methods And Results: Thirty-three patients eligible for CRT were included [21 (64%) men, 20 (61%) ischaemic aetiology, QRS 155 ± 23 ms], and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and invasive PV loop measurements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Selective pacing sites.

Minerva Cardioangiol

April 2015

Operative Unit of Cardiology II, Scuola di Specializzazione in Malattie dell'Apparato Cardiovascolare, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular and Nephrourologic Diseases, Policlinico Universitario "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, Italy -

he right ventricular apex (RVA) has always been the most used pacing site, because it is easily accessible and provides a stable lead position with a low dislodgment rate. However, it is well-known that long-term right ventricular apical pacing may have deleterious effects on left ventricular function by inducing a iatrogenic left bundle branch block, which can have strong influences on the left ventricle hemodynamic performances. More specifically, RVA pacing causes abnormal contraction patterns and the consequent dyssynchrony may cause myocardial perfusion defects, histopathological alterations, left ventricular dilation and both systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!