A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of direct referrals on time to diagnosis after an abnormal breast screening result. | LitMetric

Influence of direct referrals on time to diagnosis after an abnormal breast screening result.

Cancer Detect Prev

Manitoba Breast Screening Program, CancerCare Manitoba, 5-25 Sherbrook St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Published: May 2005

This study examined the influence of a direct referral process implemented by a population-based provincial breast screening program on the time from screening to first procedure, first procedure to diagnosis, and screening to diagnosis following an abnormal breast screening result. The direct referral process shifted the responsibility for the coordination of diagnostic follow-up procedures from the family physician to the screening program. Three cohorts of women were included: a control cohort (screened prior to the initiation of a direct referral process, n = 1347), a usual care cohort (screened after the initiation of a direct referral process but for whom permission to refer was denied by the family physician, n = 1225), and a direct referral cohort (screened after the initiation of the direct referral process and for whom permission to refer was given by the family physician, n = 1232). The direct referral cohort was subdivided into women referred to a breast health centre (BHC group) (n = 606) and women referred to a diagnostic facility (diagnostic group) (n = 626). The direct referral cohort completed all three time intervals significantly faster than the other two cohorts (P < 0.0001). The diagnostic group experienced a significantly lower time from screening to the first procedure than the other cohorts or the BHC group (P < 0.0001). However, the BHC group had a significantly lower time from first procedure to diagnosis than the other cohorts or the diagnostic group (P < 0.0001). The control and the usual care cohorts were not significantly different from each other (P = 0.6250). The direct referral process significantly reduced the time to diagnosis after an abnormal screening result.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdp.2004.07.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

direct referral
36
referral process
24
diagnosis abnormal
12
breast screening
12
screening result
12
family physician
12
cohort screened
12
initiation direct
12
referral cohort
12
bhc group
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!